The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030.
The figure elucidates the energy’s consumption in the USA from 1980 to 2030. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred in the utilisation of petrol and oil in comparison with other aspects.
To begin with, there was a dramatic upsurge for the use of petrol and oil, and coal where it, initially, stood approximately at 35 for petrol and oil and well beneath 20 for coal and terminated to well above 45 and just over 30 respectively by the end of the period shown. The utilisation of natural gas and nuclear uplifted significantly from 1980, which made up roughly at 20 and just less than 5 respectively, to 2030, which constituted at 25 and well across 5 respectively.
In contrast, 1980 to 2030 witnessed a slight palpitation for hydropower and solar use. It, firstly, upright positioned at just below 5 for both categories and achieved to just over 5 for solar and wind, and to the same number as in 1980 for hydropower.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | Kien Vu | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | Jass Rai | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Sakil | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | mohammad.iraf | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | mohammad.iraf | 78 | view |
- Bar Chart : The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 78
- The chart shows the total number of minutes (in millions) of telephone calls in Finland, divided into three categories, from 1995 – 2004. 78
- Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Writing Task 2 (an essay)Some practical skills such as money management should be taught in high school. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and real life examples. 56
- Some of people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, so, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74404761905 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95956666827 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60119047619 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.4548719057 43.030603864 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.833333333 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135145285227 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966776840575 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116940957078 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112965361063 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0781621047657 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.