The graph below shows the proportions of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040.
The given line graph below compares changes in the proportions aged 65 and 65+ in over century starting 1940 in three countries Japan, Sweden and the Unite State.
In general, from 1940 to 2000, Japan had the lowest percentage of elder people in the chart. However, in the last 40 years, on the whole the rates in three countries are predicted to climb. Moreover, the figure for Japan will be highest in 2040 compared to the remaining.
To begin with the first 60 years from 1940 to 2000, there was a true that the amount of the old people in Japan, which was less than that of in the two remaining countries at 5 percent in 1940, subsequently, the number went down gradually by nearly 2 percent in the present. At the same time, Sweden and the USA had a similar upward trend at slightly over 15 percent and almost 15 percent respectively in 2000.
Turning to the remaining years period, the whole three locations are forecasted to increase in residents who aged 65 and over, especially Japan will take off from 10 percent to 25 percent before reaching a peak of below 30 percent between 2020 and 2040. At the same time, Japan will be followed by Sweden and the USA at more than 25 percent and well under 25 percent respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-27 | Trang Carina | 67 | view |
- Some people think that nuclear is better than other source of power for meeting ever increasing global needs To what extent do you agree 92
- Some people believe that a crime is a result of social problems and poverty. Othersthink that crime is a result of a bad person’s nature. Discuss both views and give opinion 61
- Advertisements exaggerate the quality of product 56
- In some countries, many people are choosing to live alone nowadays in the past. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 61
- The diagram shows process of either recycling plastic items to produce goods or trash into dust bins to landfill 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...40 in three countries Japan, Sweden and the Unite State. In general, from 1940 to 2000, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, moreover, well, in general, on the whole, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53811659193 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41607924517 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538116591928 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.8529910389 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.875 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200850959134 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897352863798 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11371887207 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147035065977 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123902734906 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.