In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The spending of state budget is always a top concern of many countries. Regarding this amount of money, some people are of a belief that the expenditure on the construction of new railway lines is necessary for travelling between cities rather than on upgrading public transportation system. However, I personally support the idea that the state budget should be distributed reasonably to both new railway lines and the improvement of current public means of transport.
It is widely held view that the budget should be essentially allocated to build new lines for the convenience of transportation between metropolises. Actually, the construction of railways system would connect various locations and then render citizens easy access to every city corner. This access probably acts as a precursor for the development of some faraway areas. Take Ha Dong District, a 15-kilometre faraway location from city center, as an example, this area became a vivid and bustling district after the government invested in the public bus and railway infrastructure such as Bus Rapid Transportation (BRT) or Metro Rapid Transportation (MRT) to connect Ha Dong with the city center and other financial centers.
On the other hand, the maintenance and renovation facilitate the usage of public transportation in and between metropolises. It is almost certain that these means could be damaged due to severe weather and normal tear and wear and could not operate efficiently. For example, the old buses in Hanoi currently emit a high amount of carbon dioxide and dust into the atmosphere due to its outdated spare parts. Therefore, the state budget spending on maintenance and improvement will probably fix the mechanical breakdowns arising out of the operation and maintain a qualified operating status for such public means.
In conclusion, I gravitate towards the opinion of balancing the budget spending on new construction of railway lines and the renovation of current public infrastructure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where r 73
- Televisions influence the development of the creativity of children. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in the fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both t 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 471, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of current public means of transport. It is widely held view that the budget s...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 722, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity center and other financial centers. On the other hand, the maintenance and r...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, regarding, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38585209003 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09885113908 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546623794212 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.5970545354 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.583333333 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9166666667 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307308617269 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11172431652 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853507543921 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192467408739 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0996176612995 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.