The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">
The pie graphs below compare the percentages of the population in three different age groups, in Yemen and Italy, in 2000 and 2050.
Overall, the groups aged 15-59 are by far the most popular in the population in both countries. Besides, the number of elderly people in Italy is estimated to increase higher than this figure in Yemen in 2050.
By 2000, just over half of the population aged 0-14 in Yemen while this figure was 14.3% in Italy. Besides, people were aged 15-59 accounted for 46.3% and 61.6%, in Yemen and Italy, respectively. The group aged over 60 occupied 3.6% of the inhabitants of Yemen while this number in Italy was almost a quarter of the population.
By 2050, in Yemen, while people aged 15-59 are expected to grow rapidly from 46.3% to 57.3%, the children aged under 15 are anticipated to drop dramatically to 37%. In Italy, although the group aged 15-59 is predicted to decrease quickly to 46.2%, people aged over 60 tend to rise nearly double from 24,1% (2000). </span><br>
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- the diagram below shows the process of generating electricity from coal 73
- The graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. 73
- The pie graphs below compare the percentages of the population in three different age groups, in two nations, in 2000 and 2050. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to rise nearly double from 24,1% 2000.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91525423729 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86021936205 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536723163842 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1371863318 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.75 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296490355204 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140599710102 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371269999404 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170271179583 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100844053143 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.