Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The human mind and the concept of time have a somewhat puzzling relationship. We have all come across the saying “Change is the only constant”. Nothing can truly remain the same indefinitely. Regardless of how great a leader can be, his or her tenure cannot go on forever. I agree with the claim that in fields where one individual gets to exercise the most power over a majority – like that of business, politics and education, it is better if he/she steps down from power every few years. This claim is buttressed by the idea that new leadership brings about revitalization. I couldn’t agree more with this path of reasoning.
The world has witnessed some of the most trend-setting and world-changing ideas every time there is a change of power in the major fields of technology, business and politics. An individual when elected newly is brimming with fresh ideas and is full of energy to execute these ideas. Ever since Sundar Pichai has stepped up as CEO of Google, the company has introduced some of the awe-inspiring technology like the Google Assistant, Google Lens and not to mention the out of the world smartphone technology with the Google Pixel and Android Pie. Sure, these were the collective efforts of numerous engineers and computer scientists, yet, Sundar is gifted with the management acumen to bring these ideas into effect.
In line with this thought, another instance where new leadership sparked new hope was when Narendra Modi was elected as the Prime Minister of India. The country had been close to rotting under the long and tiring rule of the Congress under the then Prime Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh. Several facets influencing the country’s development underwent a major change once the Modi government came to power. There was the demonetization bill to tackle the case of severe corruption. There was the subsidization of LPG for low income families and several other steps taken towards the development of the nation.
It is thus safe to argue that when one particular individual or team of individuals tend to remain in power for a considerably long time, there occurs a dearth of novel ideas and refreshing policies to tackle the new and upcoming challenges. It would be somewhat of a nightmare for most of the American citizens if the Trump government was to remain in power indefinitely. It is imperative that every few years there should be a change of leadership for any organization or business or nation to be exposed to refreshing ideas and ultimately grow.
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had litt 68
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
- Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the 54
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the comp 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...O of Google, the company has introduced some of the awe-inspiring technology like the Googl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 374, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nt was to remain in power indefinitely. It is imperative that every few years ther...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2116.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 422.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01421800948 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90842002342 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547393364929 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.608502553 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.368421053 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2105263158 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.57894736842 5.21951772744 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153564624218 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405856164477 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468552565846 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881940451708 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404580485769 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.