The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the usages of fish and various meat, which include chicken, beef and lamb, in the country of European from 1979 to 2004.
It can be clearly seen that fish was the lowest depletion over the period. Overall, while the number of chicken was increased, fish and other meat are also decreased.
In 1979, beef was the highest depletion at 225 grams per person per week, the lamb was followed by 150 grams, which was higher than chicken lightly by 10 grams, and fish depleted 60 grams at the beginning.
There is a significant increase of chicken from 1979, it transcended lamb after 2 years at 150 grams and became the highest depletion at 200 grams in 1989 and kept raising at 250 until 2004, while beef declined dramatically to 100 grams eventually. 100 grams was decreased for the lamb finally and a soft decline was recorded on fish depletion by 15 grams to 45 grams.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-07 | cocococo123 | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-07 | cocococo123 | 73 | view |
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make?Has this been a positive or negative development? 78
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whee relevant. 61
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 739.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64779874214 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40836983112 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591194968553 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 199.8 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6621619976 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.166666667 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0964419041542 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665615542332 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666863533869 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863196945842 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741151754108 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.