The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years
The pie charts below explicate information percentage explain the comparison of kinds of energy production of France in two years by 1995 until 2005. overall, it Can be seen that the highest percentage was coal while the most negative was gas.
In the one hand in 1995 it been seen the coal get 29.80% which the highest class, adjoining by percentage gas which was 29.63% was the second higher. Interval percentage of petro was 29.27% and Nuclear get was 6.40%. in the persist percentage other get was 4.90%.
On the other hand in 2005 the coal get raised almost 1.13%. it been seen the gas also get 0.68%.in addition the petro percentage decreased drastically until 9.72%, followed with the Nuclear get decreased 3.07% percentage. But the last there was Other get increase d 4.02%.
There are also increasing unsure that is can been seeing percentage of petro and Nuclear get decreased.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-12 | Lee Daisy | view | |
| 2023-07-19 | CHÚC | view | |
| 2023-07-02 | Risti | view | |
| 2023-06-23 | ryan.pambudi | view | |
| 2023-06-23 | ryan.pambudi | view |
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 61
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country from 1950 and 2010 67
- The line chart below show The percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 61
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies.Discuss the advantage and disadvantage for young people who decide to do this 61
- The chart below show the percentage of female and male teachers in six different types of educational setting in UK in 2010. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xplain the comparison of kinds of energy production of France in two years by 199...
^^
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...France in two years by 1995 until 2005. overall, it Can be seen that the highest percen...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 218, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...o was 29.27% and Nuclear get was 6.40%. in the persist percentage other get was 4....
^^
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...as 29.27% and Nuclear get was 6.40%. in the persist percentage other get was 4.90%. On the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... 2005 the coal get raised almost 1.13%. it been seen the gas also get 0.68%.in add...
^^
Line 4, column 42, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'canned'.
Suggestion: canned
...here are also increasing unsure that is can been seeing percentage of petro and Nuc...
^^^
Line 4, column 42, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[4]
Message: Did you mean 'can be' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: can be; has been
...here are also increasing unsure that is can been seeing percentage of petro and Nuclear ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 744.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92715231788 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47380912577 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543046357616 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 207.0 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3002722884 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6666666667 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104695383321 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609427994262 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172372266955 0.0843802449381 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883398100316 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153009039306 0.0819641961636 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.