praise positive actions and ignore negative ones
To be someone who is considered well-informed or educated has never been an easy task, since there are too many ideas and concepts to understand. Considering that people only have limited time to learn and explore, some people claims that praising positive actions and ignore negative ones is the most efficient or in other words, the best way to teach. However, this statement does not take anything into consideration and, even will cause unpredictable problems.
In most Chinese traditional families, children are being educated in the similar way which mentioned above. Even when they are pupils, they are taught by their parents or teachers like these words: You should do it. It’s good for you. It’s a terrible thing and you cannot do it. Actually, we should admit that this is effective in many cases, it will help children form great views of world, develop good study and living habits, avoid going astray.
However, the biggest problem of this kind of education is: it is difficult to distinguish positive actions from negative ones . For example, a child shows great interest and talented in music, and he would rather practice musical instrument than do his homework. As his parents, should they encourage their child to focus on study the positive action and ignore the child’s gifted in music? Another example, video games. Most parent’s attitudes towards video games should be aversive, and they usually attribute their children’s terrible grades to video games. Is it real that playing video games is a negative action? It’s hard to say. Gabe Newell, every player who plays video games knows him, the founder of the most famous PC game platform-steam, showed great interest in game when he worked in Microsoft. Due to his love for game and his efforts, he achieved great success. As an ordinary person, playing video games still has some benefits like getting relax, making more friends.
The idea solution from my point of view should be just let children explore on their own. If parents plan everything for their children, children will lose their ability to judge and think independently. As parents and teachers, the most correct tasks the should finish are guiding children to the right path when children are confused. Just let children decide which actions are positive by themselves, this should be the best way to teach.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-08-26 | aaa111 | 33 | view |
| 2024-07-13 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
| 2024-06-30 | sefeliz | 66 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...uish positive actions from negative ones . For example, a child shows great intere...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, so, still, well, for example, kind of, in many cases, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1992.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12082262211 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58151014114 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573264781491 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.6293112984 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5454545455 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6818181818 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175590541375 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526056919633 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105120500736 0.0758088955206 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105169817323 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089736488961 0.0667264976115 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.