Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example through cellphone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Some advanced devices such as security cameras and cellphones are being used to monitor people in different aspects. Mostly those monitored people are not aware of this. Regardless of the fact that these technologies have improved the methods that are employed for investigating delinquencies, I believe that the related drawbacks take precedence over its benefits.
To begin with, tracing civilians via their personal gadgets such as their cellphones, emails, or other recent applications is immoral due to the fact that it allows intelligence services have access to people’s private matters. Moreover, this domination has been reducing the freedom of individuals; in spite of the fact that advancement of technology was supposed to contribute to reaching liberty, nowadays, much more confinement imposes on residents everywhere. For instance, in my country, security police hear all the phone conversations between citizens to interpret any doubtful movement against the current and in-power dictatorship regime which is even against the country’s constitutional laws.
Secondly, some people assume that the more advanced technology an invention, the more secure the society will be. For example, it has made careless drivers drive more securely and cautiously decreasing the number of collisions that has led to less injuries and deaths. In addition, the more employment of security cameras, the less statistics of crimes, burglaries or robberies.
To conclude, like any other modern accomplishments of the man, technology has both its negative and positive effects on our lives. I believe that the principal aim of the technology, which is to give man more freedom, cannot be sustained eternally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-13 | akbarandarz | 78 | view |
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example through cellphone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening. Do you think the advant 78
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- Millions of people every year move to English-speaking countries such as Australia, Britain or America, in order to study at school, college or university.Why do so many people want to study in English? Why is English such an important international langu 67
- Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- It is said that "Not everything that is learned is contained in books".Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books. In your opinion, which source is more important? Why? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun injuries is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...he number of collisions that has led to less injuries and deaths. In addition, the m...
^^^^
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun statistics is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ore employment of security cameras, the less statistics of crimes, burglaries or rob...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65503875969 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10321851411 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658914728682 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3674697578 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.636363636 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5454545455 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203853782406 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850804053127 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889664105767 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124252059077 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0932817811536 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.