The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding.
The pictures below compare the way buildings can be shielded in places that tend to be flooded.
Overall, the main difference between the two diagrams is that the houses are built with or without the protection of the stop bank in front of them.
In the first diagram, the stop bank is constructed with a peak which is higher than a 100-year flood level to protect the behind house from flooding. Besides, this building faces another threat that is the rainwater that runoff from a higher mountain to the internal pond. Therefore, the floodgate is built to drain the internal water to the river outside the stop bank.
In the second picture, flooding can harm to the house which is constructed on the stilts and has no protection by the stop bank in front of it. Moreover, the house floor level is only higher than the 100-year flood level 300 mm which is called free board. This kind of house can prone to flooding if the flood level in 100 years overcome the house floor level.
- The graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. 67
- The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006. 73
- The tables compare the amount of money of selling coffee and bananas, in two separate years, in five difference EU nations. 73
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by day car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030. 56
- the diagram below shows the process of generating electricity from coal 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, moreover, second, therefore, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61931818182 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28326392763 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534090909091 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.3274324521 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.625 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265738763203 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114663540062 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076218070843 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154022627298 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323486362828 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.