The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding.
The process illustrates how different between protecting houses from flooding in where has a stopbank and without stopbank. Overall, the gap from ground level to the house floor level, which is equiped stopbank, is shorter than the other.
As can be seen from the first process, the stopbank, which is higher by freeboard (300mm) than 100-year flood level, works to prevent water overflowing from river into the internal ponding. In addition, internal runoff especially rainwater flows into interal ponding and escapes to the river through a system of floodgate and berm, which has function on draining water in one direction.
Turning to the aspect of both sides, it is clear that the height of building without stopbank have to be lifted up by a freeboard to the 100-year flood which is called ponding level. Moreover, the level of water in internal ponding is higher than where has a stopbank.
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding. 56
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding 78
- Do you agree that modern technology has given us more leisure time than before? 56
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015. 73
- Some people think that telling the trust is not always essential. It is necessary to tell lies sometime. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 756.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07382550336 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50769726263 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577181208054 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2903324913 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12613505937 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666601877764 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410086494211 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899388500325 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033939777871 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.