The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented pie chart compares 4 types of vehicles in terms of the percentage they occupy in people’s total utilization, while the given table indicates 5 distinct reasons for which residents travel by car. Both graphs refer to Edmonton.
Overall, car is the most prevailing means of transport among surveyed ones. In addition, it is also evident that most people choose car for work and business purposes.
Turning into detail, car accounts for the highest proportion among 4 transportations, with 45%, followed by a 35-percent rate of Light Rail Transit. By contrast, the figure for bus is much lower, which accounts for only 10%. This number is equal to that of taxi, making them the least popular surveyed means of transport.
Regarding to reasons explaining why people choose cars for transportation, commuting to work occupy the biggest percentage of 55%. In addition, a 45-percent proportion makes business rank second, which is slightly higher than that of taking children to school. On the contrary, the smallest figure of 15% is shared by both leisure activities and shopping.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-15 | phuong cao | 78 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of population in three different age group in Japan.Summarize the information by selecting and reviewing the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 89
- Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of transport. However, others think money should be spent on other priorities (e.g: environment, cost). Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- High school students are usually not good at managing money. What are the reasons? What are the solutions? 84
- The bar chart below shows the estimated sales of jeans for two companies in 2014 in Turkey. The pie chart shows the projected market share of the two companies in jeans at the end of 2015. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feat 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y both leisure activities and shopping.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, second, so, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27840909091 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87627419662 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647727272727 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.3718270705 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0818534984672 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361983003384 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0265830230965 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0519487815298 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141789380592 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.