The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at Queen marry Hospital since its construction in 1960.
The given maps illustrates how the infrastructure of the Queen Mary Hospital has been evolved from 1960 to 2000.
Overall, the development of Hospital was done in two phases and the main focus was construction and expansion of the Cancer center while the Hospital building remained same throughout the period.
Regarding the first phase from 1960 to 1980,besides the main road half of the total area of the Shopping center was utilized for building the Cancer center and in the rest land Pharmacy building was planted. Moreover, The Nursing school was also opened up in the farmland behind the Cancer center and Pharmacy Building with internal roads surrounding the School.
In the second phase from 1980 to 2000, area of the Cancer center was significantly tripled by replacing the Nursing school which was reconstructed in the half area of the Car park. However, The pharmacy and Hospital complex was maintained in the same manner up to 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-25 | karan dadral | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | MaganpreetSingh | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | Dang Thi Truc Linh | 22 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | Shivani Jani | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | Hoang Luan | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows the number of girls per 100 boys enrolled in different levels of school education. 67
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport. 73
- The diagram below give information about the Eiffel Tower in Paris and an outline project to extend it underground. 73
- Advances in technology and automation have reduced the need for manual labor. Therefore, working hours should be reduced. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The line graph shows the data about export of cloth by three countries 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...Hospital was done in two phases and the main focus was construction and expansion of the C...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07643312102 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67090957574 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509554140127 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3243580449 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.833333333 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1666666667 5.23603664747 232% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.069310162921 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456615359633 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447722783614 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0610016213394 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445070853429 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.