Many animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea
These days, it becomes a controversial topic that extinction of animals species currently is caused by the excessive of human activities either on land or in the sea. In this essay, I would discuss firstly, the several reasons why human activity could dwindling numbers of animals species. Secondly, what measures and solutions could be taken to prevent more animals extinction will happen before coming to reasonable conclusion.
Initially, the main reasons is obviously cone from most of the people getting lack of environmental awareness especially on animals existence. Firstly, overhunting several kinds of animal tend to frequently occur which gives a big impact to animals depopulation. Poaching in the forest and blasting explosive material for fishing are such an existential threat for the wildlife. It is because hunting without rules regulate it will endanger the amount of species whilst fishing by exploding material will damage the marine ecosystems and both lead to habitat loss. Secondly, after industrial revolution, pollution also contributes to the extinction problem. As we know, waste often produced by every industry in this world whose one kind of pollution. Liquid waste flows to river and move to the sea and contaminating the water and marine life. As the result, the water is tainted and harmful for both land and marine animals due to pollutant particles contained which exacerbate the species depopulation.
To make a decrement of extinction number, raising awareness to conserve animals species is necessary. We may start from stop to do unregulated poaching and illegal fishing. Hunting animals with aim to preserve it or fishing in sufficient amount are not commit an offense. Another effort that we can do is began to process the waste such as recycling or reducing the solid waste and filtrating the liquid pollutant before flow it to the river. For instance, compiling the coffee plastic and comb them become a pencil pouch is one of recycling waste processes.
In conclusion m, animals extinction recently occur and it happens to be rated with human activities as the cause. However, it is convenient to prevent it sustainably just by start to concern and aware to our environment especially the ecosystem of animals.
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems 73
- the sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday 67
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required 73
- Internet users in three different countries between 1999 and 2009 84
- The proportion of carbohydrates, protein, and fat in three difference diets. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'dwindle'
Suggestion: dwindle
...everal reasons why human activity could dwindling numbers of animals species. Secondly, w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 360, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...olutions could be taken to prevent more animals extinction will happen before coming to...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'coned'.
Suggestion: coned
...nitially, the main reasons is obviously cone from most of the people getting lack of...
^^^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...f environmental awareness especially on animals existence. Firstly, overhunting several...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28888888889 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85213803278 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561111111111 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9226434275 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.777777778 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325400065658 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921603612768 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114821874348 0.0667982634062 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195380460286 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104139071987 0.056905535591 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.