Some people say history is one of the most important school subject. Others think that, in today's world, subjects like science and technology are more important than history
Discuss both views and give your opinion
The heated argument about the more important school subject between History and Science and Technology related subjects still persists. While some individuals believe history is one of the most imperative subjects in educational institutions, others disagree and claim that Science and Technology subjects take more priority than history. Currently, Science and Technology helps grow the world with its several discoveries, so, in my opinion, it is more essential than history. In this essay, I will examine both views and draw a conclusion.
On the one hand, there are some people who think history helps to grow culture and tradition of a country. They believe that as historical occurrences are being taught in schools, the students tend to have increasing knowledge about the heritages and heroes of their great nations. Advocates of this view cite the wealth of knowledge of the ancient architectural structures and past warriors that the history pupils have as evidence to their claim. These proponents claim that, the more the students know about these historical information, the higher the value of the culture of the nation.
Others, on the other hand, believe the world is growing due to the influence of Science and Technology subjects, which I believe. They claim that if science subjects have not been promoted, there would not have been solutions to many problems that the world has faced. Many nations have been able to resolve issues revolving around communication and occupation with the aid of the Global System for Mobile Communication and the internet respectively. With these technological developments, work has been incredibly eased and messages have been flexibly conveyed compared to the ancient days. I believe this tremendous growth will continue if we prioritise Science and Technology over history in schools.
In conclusion, although history provides detailed information about the past which promotes culture, the beneficial effect of Science and Technology subjects on the development of the world cannot be overemphasized. Not only, therefore, are Science and Technology subjects the major contributing factor of the rapid rise of the world, but are also more important than history as school subjects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-20 | adeagboridwan | 73 | view |
- You recently bought a piece of equipment for your kitchen but it did not work. You phoned the shop but no action was taken.Write a letter to the shop manager. In your letter-Describe the problem with the equipment- explain what happened when you called t 78
- As people live longer and longer the idea of cloning human beings in order to provide spare parts is becoming a reality The idea horrifies most people yet it is no longer mere science fiction To what extent do you agree with such a procedure Have you any 92
- Boxing is a blood sport which often results in physical injury It is inappropriate for this sport to exist in the modern age Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience You 55
- Advances in technology and automation have reduced the need for manual labour.(opinion) Therefore, working hours should be reduced.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The number of old people around the world is increasing dramatically.Could this have more positive or negative effects on society? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be overemphasized. Not only, therefore, are Science and Technology subjects the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47126436782 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86213243709 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522988505747 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0403294763 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.933333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361652679486 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122002271782 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10520059556 0.0667982634062 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2292362079 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136678696339 0.056905535591 240% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.