Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
It is irrefutable that funds are majorly raised from foreign tourist by visiting galleries and ancient sites. Mostly foreign travelers prefer to visit these sites more often as compared with local residents. This essay will discuss the reason behind such attitude and the probable solution to invite more local visitors to visit these historical places.
Various factors contribute to this behavior of local people towards their native museums and historical places. Firstly, travelling is believed to be an important part of visit at any location, however, locals do not need to travel long distance to visit their nearby historical places, hence they avoid and prefer to move out of home location to visit any foreign sites. Secondly, locals are more knowledgeable about their religions or historical places than any other individuals, consequently they lack interest in touring such places and are more willing to visit new places every time.
Many steps can be taken to attract local people towards their own art galleries. Encouraging youth by exhibiting the local talent. The youths will be more involved if they are allowed to present their work and promote their art on national and international levels. This step will attract and encourage the younger generation especially to participate and visit these places. Another step can be involving more local people in the development and maintenance of such sites, the emotional bonds will be created and families of working individual will take interest in visiting these places more often.
In conclusion, lack of interest and long-distance travel are the reasons that local people ignore their native places to visit. More involvement of local people can be an effective way to gain more attention from local people to their regional museums and ancient sites.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-27 | Ayesha dar | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | amanda.mosby | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | Ankita7443 | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-21 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-21 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
- Smacking children is the best way to form discipline. To what extent do you agree? 73
- Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress, because what matters is the quality of their work. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Children can learn effectively by simply watching television, therefore they should be allowed to do so to watch T.V. regularly at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- As global trade increases between different countries many daily necessities are produced in other countries Such goods are usually transported a long distance Do the benefits of this trend outweigh its disadvantages 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...itors to visit these historical places. Various factors contribute to this behav...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...nd visit these places. Another step can be involving more local people in the development an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in visiting these places more often. In conclusion, lack of interest and long...
^^^^
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eir regional museums and ancient sites.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35640138408 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59568622029 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532871972318 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1829394055 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.076923077 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.457225210785 0.244688304435 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184529479464 0.084324248473 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655795851603 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307603706733 0.151304729494 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00689095895911 0.056905535591 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.