Governments and big companies should work together to reverse environmental damage, rather than making individuals responsible for that. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and relevant examples.
Collective efforts are required to address the problems of environmental damage. Some people think that Governments and Corporate houses should take the onus of correct the current situation and individuals should excluded from this responsibility. Honestly, I disagree to this notation, as I believe that as a part of this world, every individual is equally responsible for actions and reactions of environmental damage.
Firstly, lets us look into the reasons why people think that Governments and big companies should take the lead to work to reverse the depletion of natural resources. People elect government so that government can make policies and rules, considering the welfare of the people. Government of any nation has a full power and authority to make strict rules and regulations to control the pollution and overuse of natural resources. Government can drive the national level campaign to promote recycling of materials. For example in European countries, government promotes recycling of materials as a result the generation of rubbish is reduced upto 60% in last 8 years. Big companies are in better position to take the corrective measures to reduce pollution. These companies can use renewable sources of energy and adopt the better ways of waste disposal. As industrialization is the major cause of environmental damage, so industries should take the ownership to do some serious efforts to protect environment.
Although, Government and big companies are in better position to create the impactful recovery to environmental damage, but the efforts at individual level can never ignored. For example, in my Society, every family keep the surrounding of their home clean and well maintained as a result whole society gives a great feel of cleanliness without putting any extra budget or extra manpower. Similarly if every individual take the onus to protect environment. They can reduce the use of plastics. People can reverse the environmental damage by avoiding the unnecessary use of vehicles. Individuals should save water, grow trees and start using solar energy to save the environment.
In the end, we can conclude that it is not a single sided responsibility of governments and big corporate houses but individuals also have the share the onus of environmental protection.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-26 | Parismz | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | Gaurav2019 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | Rajie | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-06 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-06 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
- You are working at a company. Write a letter to your manager to recommend opening a cafeteria at work. In your letter say– Why is it required?– Give recommendations how and where to do it.– Explain why it would be beneficial to all workers. 78
- Write a letter to the local council about the closure of a playground in your area because children don t use it much In your letter say Why don t many children use it How is the playground important for children Give some suggestions how to increase the 61
- Governments and big companies should work together to reverse environmental damage, rather than making individuals responsible for that. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and relevant examples. 73
- Some people believe that sports are a key element in our society, while others argue that it’s just a recreational activity to be done in one’s free time. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- You worked for a company abroad, but had to quit suddenly and return to your hometown. Write a letter to your colleagues to say goodbye. In you letter– Explain why you had to leave.– Apologize for not saying goodbye properly.– Why would you miss the 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...ing any extra budget or extra manpower. Similarly if every individual take the onus to pr...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, honestly, if, look, similarly, so, well, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40443213296 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10826530703 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0046294064 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.388888889 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0555555556 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274396751468 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834736405612 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503901323193 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172633549856 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405649914339 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.