The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.
The line graphs gives information about the amount and type of fast food consumed by australian teenagers over the period of 25 years from 1975 to 2000. In general, there were two trends which are downward and upward.
It is clear to see that, in 1975, fish and chips had the highest number of times eaten;however, pizza and hamburgers were both at the bottom. fish and chips was eaten more than 5 times pizza and hamburgers at the beginning, which was in 1975 around 0 to 20 times eaten. After that, in 1980, fish and chips still the highest but drop down to nearly 80 times eaten; otherwise, pizza grew slightly to 20 times eaten and hamburgers rose dramatically to 40 times eaten.
The year 1985 and 1990 marks the point at which hamburgers and pizza overtook that fish and chips number of times eaten at 84 and 63 times eaten. Between 1990 and 1995 pizza and hamburgers rapidly rose. Besidde fish and chips fell sharply till 2000 at 40 times eaten. From 1995 to 2000 hamburgers and pizza remain stable at 100 and 80 times eaten.
In conclusion, hamburgers and pizza became popular in diet of australian diet at that time. In other hand fish and chips, the highest times eaten fast food was replace by two other fast food. We can say that australian teenager changed their taste of fast food through 25 years from 1975 to 2000
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Sheetal Bataniya | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | asdasdasd | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Ashley Cheung | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | iamkristinjoi | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | Bao Trang | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 145, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Fish
...and hamburgers were both at the bottom. fish and chips was eaten more than 5 times p...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dramatically to 40 times eaten. The year 1985 and 1990 marks the point a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...table at 100 and 80 times eaten. In conclusion, hamburgers and pizza beca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 176, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'replaced'.
Suggestion: replaced
..., the highest times eaten fast food was replace by two other fast food. We can say that...
^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... food through 25 years from 1975 to 2000
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, still, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 6.8 294% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64583333333 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25443621309 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483333333333 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7563048974 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9166666667 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201262562579 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105047005209 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165976395236 0.0843802449381 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199402878207 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.178723383996 0.0819641961636 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.67 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.