“In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed’: Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples.
Recently a phenomenon of war and its corresponding impact has sparked an ongoing controversy which inevitably leads to a moot question, does a common man suffer with the group idea of war? whereas many believe man are sufferer however many hold its opposite view that war is better for all nation. In this essay, the topic will be discussed with related examples.
From the social standpoint, life of war are in danger for ordinary people that offer some noticeable effect in the society which are rooted in the fact that thousands of lives killing are inextricably bound up. According to my academic experience I performed an experiment which discovered that group decisions of war cause people to surrender their lives, encourages unwilling one to take part, threatening to their families, non advantageous outcome to individuals and many more. Thus beneficial ramification of people as encountered in the society.
Within the realm of society, it can be clearly visioned that to generate war for betterment, man power is obliged to participate. Moreover, fundamental aspect of war is to have great outcome for the society. A scientific research, undertaken by some prestigious university asserted that people getting kill for the society or nations improvement is itself act an assert. Those lost lives are respected and remarked as history. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived the notion of people killing in war is beneficial when it comes for proper or logical way.
To conclude, there has been several compelling arguments on both side. I profoundly believe that the common man suffering in war far outweigh its positive sides. Not only lives are being lost but also societies are getting weaker.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-27 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Alireza.r.68 | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Alireza.r.68 | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | Anand_DD | 80 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | Sidra018 | 80 | view |
- Creativity is inborn skill or can be developed through learning? Your opinion 77
- Positive and negative effects of today’s communication 88
- Right amount of motivation and practice can train better than classroom training. What is your opinion? Provide relevant examples. 80
- “In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed’: Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples. 80
- The illiterates of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn. Agree or Disagree? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
... man suffer with the group idea of war? whereas many believe man are sufferer however m...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...s many believe man are sufferer however many hold its opposite view that war is better fo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 483, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...s outcome to individuals and many more. Thus beneficial ramification of people as en...
^^^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ty or nations improvement is itself act an assert. Those lost lives are respected and rem...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18637992832 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86385535628 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620071684588 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8771072191 50.4703680194 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.357142857 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 7.25397266985 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 2.75862068966 362% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192323941731 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061144291006 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440037351466 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11565059802 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349122223509 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.