advantages and disadvantages of allocating tax to unhealthy behavior
The reading passage and lecture both discuss the consequences of imposing high taxes on cigarette or other unhealthy products. The reading mentiones that this policy has many social benefits but the lecturer claims that it can be really challenging.
First, the reading makes an argument that these extra taxes discourage people from indulging in unhealthy behavior that is conducive to buying fewer of them. Although, the professor states that not only they never stop buying it both also they will buy cheap and low-quality materials. Further more, these cheap materails are really harmful to their health like buying unhealhy food than healthy food.
Second, the reading mentiones that these taxes are really fair because whem they become sick they should pay much money for medical costs and others people do not contribute equally to covering these costs. Whereas, the speaker states that this method is unfair. Because the people who buy cigarettes have different incomes. The tax is great for low-income people but is not considerable for rich people.
Third, the reading claims that this policy increases the government's revenue and it can be used on medical assistance and bublic project like building stadium or park. However, the lecturer declares that this policy increase dependency of government to tax and it will stimulate the government to implement other policies to enhance it like banning smoking in public places or private house.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-03 | sefeliz | 76 | view |
| 2023-08-20 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-20 | YasamanEsml | 88 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | 宋致遠 | view | |
| 2023-06-14 | Simin_MB | 65 | view |
- which one do you decide to perform. learn students mathematic or reading. help people who can not afford to build or rent home. visit and assist eldry people 86
- are government doing good in educating people to pay attention to the importance of eating healthy food 90
- workers are satisfied to do defferent tasks than doing similar tasks 83
- some prefer to work in companies with less vacation but challenging projects. others like to work in companies with more vacation and less challenge 73
- all university students required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ribute equally to covering these costs. Whereas, the speaker states that this method is...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...aker states that this method is unfair. Because the people who buy cigarettes have diff...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 58, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...g claims that this policy increases the governments revenue and it can be used on medical a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, really, second, so, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2987012987 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45815031103 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601731601732 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0648038665 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.272727273 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10299345014 0.272083759551 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0409279976312 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578228146586 0.0662205650399 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0622945156259 0.162205337803 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240321636994 0.0443174109184 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.