Human activity has had a negative effect on plants and animal all over the world. Some people think that it is too late to do something about it. Others think that there is still time to take effective action. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Its's often argued, living things around the globe are facing decline due to inhabitants chores however a few people presume that nothing could be done now to prevent such diverse effect on the life of living things as it’s not possible now while limited citizens postulate that still we can take mandatory steps to prevent them. This essay shed light on both views.
Firstly, to begin with residents assume that human day-to-day activities hasdspoiled the surrounding of various plants and animals by carrying out certain activities like people drive cars releasing toxic gasses which contributes in polluting the environment hence the emission of such chemicals have reduce the level of oxygen in the air and thus create a negative effect on living creatures. some tight measures are required for limiting individuals from utilising such cars. For example, RTA and develop certain guidelines and laws to stop these activities.
On the other hand, few inhabitants believe that it’s not approachable to restrict any negative activities harming plants and animals. People are so afraid to take necessary initiatives as they have become frequent ignorant of their surroundings. People have belief that pre created rules and laws are difficult to amend. For example, environment management agencies are not flexible to listen to individuals and update their existing policies for betterment.
To recapitulate, its not difficult to change anything harming livings things, in my opinion we such adapt a balance approach to safe our environment and living things. we as human being can involve in few initiatives to protect our planet Earth. We can collaborate with regulating bodies to enhance their policies, Laws and rules. Individuals can take self-initiatives in causing harmful effects on this blessed environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-28 | uzma2011 | 67 | view |
| 2019-03-25 | davidlvg1108 | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-03 | ahmedarbani | 84 | view |
| 2018-12-30 | ratnumohit | 78 | view |
- with an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past.To what extent do you agree? 11
- Write a letter to your English-speaking friend. In your letter:•Explain why you have gone to live in the new city•Describe the place where you are living•Invite your friend to come and see you 87
- With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past.To what extent do you agree? 78
- More and more businesses as well as individuals are choosing to communicate either professionally or socially using technology rather than being face-to-face.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using technology for communicating. 89
- Some people say that having a lot of TV channels is good, while others argue that it reduces the quality of programs. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'reduced'.
Suggestion: reduced
...nce the emission of such chemicals have reduce the level of oxygen in the air and thus...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
... a negative effect on living creatures. some tight measures are required for limitin...
^^^^
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...safe our environment and living things. we as human being can involve in few initi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, still, thus, while, for example, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55871886121 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17921291986 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622775800712 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 103.198722528 49.4020404114 209% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 120.153846154 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144024898883 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439755984651 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373115166868 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0820604724271 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017283837601 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.