Human activity has had negative effect on plants and animal all over the world. Some people think that it is too late to do something about it. Others think that there is still time to take effective action.
Discuss both the sides and give your opinion.
Flora and fauna have had a deleterious impact of activity which is done by people around the globe. Owing to this, few men and women deem that it is impossible to do anything about it, while others concur that it is not too late to recover the damage by taking productive steps. While overpopulation and industrialism could be a plausible reason for this predicament, I believe that it could be resolved by innovating Eco-friendly technology.
On the one hand, human population is increasing at a staggering pace due to which exploitation of natural resources is done by various industries to fulfill the fundamental needs of people. That is to say that, cities are incessantly expanding and consequently, it creates scarcity of space for the natural inhabitants because of this maneuver trees and vermin are in jeopardize. To exemplify, a survey in Times of India showed that more than half of the land acquired by people which was the natural habitat of different animals. However, I believe that by taking some profound actions, these issue could be untangled.
On the other hand, to tackle this problem, invention of latest technologies which do not cause pernicious effects to environment is required. In other words, when people will find alternative ways through which less harm will occur to wild life as well as environmental friendly, it will be beneficial to all the wild life fraternity. For example, Singapore has taken an initiative in which they are building skyscrapers to accommodate as many people as possible as well as less perilous to mother nature. Thus, it is not the worst case scenario which cannot be solved.
In conclusion, while overpopulation and growth of industries are two pivotal reason why some people believe that it is too late to take any actions, but, by innovating technologies which are harmless to plants and animal the issue could be solved. Furthermore, it is recommended that before exploiting natural resources humans should think about the ramifications sincerely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould be untangled. On the other hand, to tackle this problem, invention of lat...
^^
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
...and, to tackle this problem, invention of latest technologies which do not cause pernici...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hink about the ramifications sincerely.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in other words, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13981762918 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00480179147 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565349544073 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.0858453259 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.076923077 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0769230769 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172249165605 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567432686229 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485495119873 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10542383542 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468659582569 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.