The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Their is a huge difference between cooperation and competition. At some level, the both words could have the opposite sides. Cooperation teaches us how to work in unity and competition is said to be self satisfaction by pooling others down. To be a leader, a person must have skills by which he can win the hearts of his collegues. So, it is important for a society to prepare the young generation in the sense of coorporation instead of competition.
A leader should have all the skills of idiosyncracy. He is the one who handles its own co-orporation whether its governmental or industrial sector. He should have ablity to speak sincerly, fluently with the people under him. As a leader, he should listen the opinions of employee so that everyone in the union should be the part of important decision making processes.
Competition can bring a person form peak to the base since it is just like pooling the other person down for our own sake. Either a person can reach at top or he can be pooled down if one tries to compete with others. One should maintain its uniqueness while working in association.
As we can see many examples who has been totally destroyed by competition. The major example is mobile manufacturing company called as Nokia. At the time of early 21th century, they have gained people's attraction in the field of mobile industry. But, many companies introduced like samsung, sony, etc. They introduced Android operating system which was far better than the operating system which nokia implemented. New companies works in union so that they can achieve their market in mobile industries, but nokia stucked in its own OS called symbian. Nokia rejected the android operationg system.
Finally, we can say that cooperation is everything if one wants to success as a leader. With competition, either a person can be a leader or he can be the naive employee for those coorporation.
- In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organizationstarted issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conservingresources and recycling materials. Companies that receive 3
- communal online encyclopedias 75
- A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor. 50
- "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerne 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: There
Their is a huge difference between cooperatio...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...niqueness while working in association. As we can see many examples who has been t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 324.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87345679012 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85427419704 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552469135802 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8531946734 60.3974514979 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.1904761905 118.986275619 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4285714286 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.28571428571 5.21951772744 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140684296012 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042096556973 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683509365838 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0765812870079 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377882885995 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 14.1392134831 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.