To solve the ever-increasing environmental hazards throughout the world, the best way is to increase the price of fuel. What is your opinion on the above assumption?
it is sometimes argued that increasing of price of fuel would bring about the most advantage impacts on environment. I completely agree that this kind of scheme would be a good idea.
Nowadays, national resources is exploited more and more, probably leading to exhausted. fuel created a lot of economic value, however it also negatives consequences for environment. Firstly, the petroleum is used in cars and industries which eliminated very much emission such as carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide and hazardous chemicals. so it would make higher temperature than average and environment have to face many challenges like storms, flash floods, drought, acid rain, greenhouse gases to name just a few. Secondly, research on fossil fuel in soil or water would cause of pollution as well as lower quality. For example, this will inevitable have effects on biodiversity and ecosystem as the existence of a large number of different kind of animals and plants which make a balanced environment.
The most of effective solution is to raise price of fuel. When everyone would tent to use less petroleum and gases. They would find other resources to save money like biofuels, and recycled things. Beside, increasing of price of fuel would impulse scientists who have invented more model machine. For instance, In recent years the appearance of electric cars and hydro cars saved a good deal of fusion power. governments could give appreciate policies that help everyone have activities environmentally friendly, so it could increase standard of living.
In conclusion, I believe that personal responsibility and collective responsibility would be raised if governments increase the price of fuel. And polluted environment would not pose a threat to animals, plant and life
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-30 | deepalis | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | Do Thi Quynh Hoa | 83 | view |
- To solve the ever-increasing environmental hazards throughout the world, the best way is to increase the price of fuel. What is your opinion on the above assumption? 78
- Nowadays, more and more young people hold the important positions in the government. Some people think that is a good thing while others argue that it is not suitable. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 11
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? How can we increase its popularity? 11
- In education and employment, some people work harder than others. Why do some people work harder? Is it always a good thing to work hard. 61
- Write the advantages and disadvantages of CCTV cameras. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is sometimes argued that increasing of ...
^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Fuel
...nd more, probably leading to exhausted. fuel created a lot of economic value, howeve...
^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...arbon monoxide and hazardous chemicals. so it would make higher temperature than a...
^^
Line 3, column 715, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...rsity and ecosystem as the existence of a large number of different kind of animals and plants wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e biofuels, and recycled things. Beside, increasing of price of fuel would impuls...
^^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Governments
...cars saved a good deal of fusion power. governments could give appreciate policies that hel...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35125448029 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93995528178 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623655913978 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6182959629 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3125 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154983945753 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531556023999 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636989094664 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107319287497 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308944849435 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.