The many countries, children are engaged in different kinds of paid park. Some people regard this as completely wrong other considers it a valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion?
The implication of children are engaged in different kinds of paid park wrong other considers it a valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility, which is fairly debated has now gained further attention from numerous arenas. The sizable influence of this subject has generated controversy over the potential impact of this tread. Let us examine both views before reaching a contrite decision.
At the outset, there are diverse reasons why this subject is considered as vital, but the most conspicuous one steam form the facts that children do paid work then distract them form studies. Furthermore children do paid work this is over burden from children. Study in a big burden of children.
Nevertheless, some people adopt opposing views and trend to believe that when children’s do work little age there are gain the work experience. Moreover children do work they are understand the value of hard earned money.
The importance of children are engaged in different ki9nds of paid work and some people regards this a completely wrong but other consider it a valuable work experience can be debated, but the fact remains that there were several factors that lead to this theme and matters. Eventually, according to the above analysis, it can be concluded that paid work only depended for children and their parents it can be predicted that in the near future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-31 | Yadwinder randhawa | 77 | view |
- In many countries, children are engaged in different kinds of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong. While other consider it a valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion? 77
- In some countries, the no of shooting increase because many people have guns at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 55
- Mobile phones 77
- Medical technology is responsible for an increase in human’s life expectancy. Is it a boon or a curse for the mankind? 80
- Give your opinion whether formal written examination is an effective way to assess students. 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...d work then distract them form studies. Furthermore children do paid work this is over burd...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...age there are gain the work experience. Moreover children do work they are understand th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'understood'.
Suggestion: understood
...nce. Moreover children do work they are understand the value of hard earned money. The ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be predicted that in the near future.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1179.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19383259912 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74988686632 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5859030837 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.7146746166 50.4703680194 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.9 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439469563364 0.242375264174 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154620748222 0.0925447433944 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14370024982 0.071462118173 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247775052964 0.151781067708 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092987867299 0.0609392437508 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.