People now have the freedom to work and live anywhere in the world due to the development of communication technology and transportation.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, the development of communication and transportation makes people free to choose the place to live and work around the world. However, although this is beneficial in order to find the convenience of living and to reduce the living cost, the drawbacks such as local identity degradation and environmental damage must be considered.
It is true that the freedom due to the communication improvement and integrated transportation would allow the workers to select the convenient neighborhood for the family. Some people who are not interested in city crowd will choose the suburb to live as it is more comfortable and less pollution. In addition, the citizens are able to reduce the cost of living since some big cities require high expense to live, so that the village or smaller town will be chosen. The remote working can be conducted, and if the citizens want to reach some places, they will use the available transportation.
Besides the benefits, some drawbacks are worth to mention. Some inhabitants moving to another place also move their culture and habits which will assimilate to the new place. There will be a possibility of local culture degradation and new habits existence among the new neighborhood. Moreover, the freedom will affect the environment. When it is easy to live and work anywhere, there will be the new area opened for residence as long as the communication and transportation are adequate, and this will sacrifice the former forests or farmland.
To recapitulate, although the freedom to live and work anywhere is possible due to the development of communication and transportation, there will be some drawbacks of which the local culture will be degraded, and the surroundings will be damaged. However, if the people can reduce these disadvantages, the comforts will be obtained, and the household expense will be reduced.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-31 | Omfiann | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-18 | manpreet kaurs | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-18 | manpreet kaurs | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-18 | manpreet kaurs | 73 | view |
- One problem faced by almost every large city is traffic congestion. What do you think the causes are? What are the solutions of this issue? 67
- zz 11
- the three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000 78
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 73
- the three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'habits'' or 'habit's'?
Suggestion: habits'; habit's
...ty of local culture degradation and new habits existence among the new neighborhood. M...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, moreover, so, in addition, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19601328904 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12866863939 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488372093023 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6750486671 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.307692308 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187514992118 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767217631899 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702925957842 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136908476732 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515757256734 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.