The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.
The graph illustrates the growth of the population from years 2000 to the present year. It also depicts the prediction of the population growth from the present year to the year 2050.
At the year 2000, the population of China was recorded approximately 1.25 billion which is greater than India’s population of 1 billion. The population of both countries showed an increase approximately until the year 2028. At the same year, the population of both countries is predicted to be equal which is predicted to be 1.45 billion.
After the year 2028, the population of China is estimated to decrease until the year 2050. Whereas, India’s population is expected to increase till 2050. It is estimated to be around 1.6 billion greater than China’s expected population of 1.45 billion.
Over the years 2000 to 2050 the population of India is predicted to increase steadily,whereas the population of China is expected to peak till 2030 and show a dip in population till 2050.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Kien Vu | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | Nguyen Bao Han | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | cindycornelia98 | 78 | view |
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 53
- Claim: The emergence of the online “blogosphere” and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States. Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political 50
- Social media is becoming increasingly popular amongst all age groups. However, sharing personal information on social media websites does have risks.Do you think that the advantages of social media outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which is predicted to be 1.45 billion. After the year 2028, the population of C...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 86, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , whereas
... India is predicted to increase steadily,whereas the population of China is expected to ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12962962963 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03955155365 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 67.0 106.607317073 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.413580246914 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1395104364 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3333333333 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.500198634372 0.215688989381 232% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.260645272063 0.103423049105 252% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926654325984 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.350740370587 0.15604864568 225% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466973612062 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.