The pie chart shows the main sources of energy for USA in 1980 and 1990.
The pie charts give information about the proportion of five different sources of energy in the USA: oil, natural gas, coal, hydroelectric power and nuclear power between 1980 and 1990. It is noticeable that the amount of oil consuming decreased and that of hydroelectric power still maintained. By contrast, there was a significant growth in the amount of coal and nuclear power using as one of the main sources.
Oil consumption accounted for 42% in 1980. Despite its dramatic decreasing to 33%, oil was still has a good proportion in 1990. The percentage of natural gas consuming also saw a slight decline but only decreased from 26% to 25%. That of hydroelectric power remained at 5% after ten years.
On the other hand, the proportion of using nuclear power was similar to the percentage of hydroelectric power in 1980, at exactly 5 percent. This then made up about 10% in 1990 while the rate of coal using grew from almost a fifth to just under a third.
- Visitors to two music sites on the web. 56
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future. Others, by contrast, are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than h 73
- The main sources of energy of USA in 1980 and 1990. 56
- The pie charts below compare the water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 84
- The bar chart shows the literacy rates of various countries in 1990 and 2000. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, then, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79640718563 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77759123839 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59880239521 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9641814938 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.064415280604 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.023306155142 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659197613772 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0419219350963 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592865691741 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.