The bar chart shows the literacy rates of various countries in 1990 and 2000.
The bar chart compares and contrasts data on the changes in amount of men and women in 6 countries, which are measured in percentage, from 1990 to 2000.
A closer look at the diagram highlights the fact that both men and women per cent in communities rise tremendously during the period.
All 6 countries had an upturn at approximately 10% in 11 years. The male proportion in China reached the peak of the diagram in 1990 and 2000 at under 90% and over 90% respectively. In contrast, Brazil men per cent was one-half in the proportion during in both years and at the bottom of the male categories. Related to this fact, the percentage of women in Brazil was the highest proportion from 80% in 1990 to 90% in 2000.
While Brazil, China and Kuwait had a balance between the percentage of men and women throughout 11 years, the male percent of Bangladesh, Egypt and Pakistan exceeded the female. In 1990 the population percentage of men in the three countries were likely to doubled the women. This data still remained stable to 2000.
- the expenditure on fast food by different income groups in UK in 1990 67
- The main sources of energy of USA in 1980 and 1990. 56
- The aging population is good for business, the economy and society. Others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 56
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world 73
- Visitors to two music sites websites 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ured in percentage, from 1990 to 2000. A closer look at the diagram highlights ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s rise tremendously during the period. All 6 countries had an upturn at approxi...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtion from 80% in 1990 to 90% in 2000. While Brazil, China and Kuwait had a bal...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, still, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 24.0651302605 12% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 1615.20841683 53% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 183.0 315.596192385 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70491803279 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68672470739 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 176.041082164 53% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513661202186 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 506.74238477 48% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8469293394 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153045919362 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716552735357 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637709120592 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0989603021829 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724658249733 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 50.2224549098 152% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.