A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Education is the fundamental right that should be granted to each and every citizen and many developed countries like USA, Russia and Western parts of Europe seems to understand this concept by providing the free education to the student until they reach Collage. The authors claim of having the mandatory same school curriculum is for the student until they reach college does not however, make sense to me and I will be stating most conspicuous reasons to rear my standpoint.
Same curriculum means each and every student studying same subject until graduation. In other words, the curriculum will be loaded with subjects from every domain that increase the number of subjects needed to study and schools will have hard time arranging them in a proper schedule. Moreover, even if it will be done then students will not be able to study plethora of subjects that will count against their graduation score. Also, the student tend to get confused if they were made to study with stem of subjects as some students already have hard time studying the existing subject and increment in the existing curriculum will only make them suffer more. Consequently, it can lead to the decline in rate of graduation as well as the reputation for the schools.
It is true that many students already decided their college major by the end to Grade 11 therefore, they are more inclined to study the subject of their choice as compared to the others that already exist in their curriculum. Now making the same curriculum for every school directly means increasing of the existing subjects to study for the students. This would be the unnecessary burden on the students as they are simply not interested in gathering knowledge about subjects they does not want to major in their college.
On the top, increment of subjects in the existing curriculum would mean the need of equipped teachers and laboratory staffs, the space for the classroom and labs which would be a tedious task for the school administration. The School financial budget need to be revised as the increment of staff and space would cost hefty money. There will also be the possibility of increase in tuition fee for the students for which their parents may deter. All in all, after weighing pros and cons it will be big and not easy to make decision both from the perspective of students and school administration.
In conclusion, the aforementioned facts give a clear vision that requiring all students to study the same curriculum until the graduation would be a bogus argument.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
- The increase in automation will lead to people losing their job Do you agree or disagree with the following statement 80
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 66
- "During the past year, workers at Butler Manufacturing reported 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than workers at nearby Panoply Industries, where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours. A recent government study reports that fatigue and s 46
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 68
- Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...they reach Collage. The authors claim of having the mandatory same school curricu...
^^
Line 2, column 626, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and increment in the existing curriculum will only make them suffer more. Consequ...
^^
Line 3, column 483, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'do'
Suggestion: do
...gathering knowledge about subjects they does not want to major in their college. O...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2109.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 428.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92757009346 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62672837176 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471962616822 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.6181561289 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.6 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5333333333 23.4991977007 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 5.21951772744 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236524598259 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992857444107 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799990165861 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162818466835 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636251611142 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.