Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Whether the government budget should be invested in traffic infrastructure or public transport systems is open to debate. In my opinion, each has substantial contribute to the society, and therefore should receive equal fundings.
On the one hand, there are some benefits of improving roads and motorways. Firstly, as as there is a significant increase in the number of traffic infrastructures, the safety of commuters would also be ensured, this might contribute to reducing traffic road fatalities. Secondly, nowadays there is a significant rise in the number of cars, motorbikes and scooter in downtown areas. This lead to one of the most aching issues is urban traffic congestion in these places. A feasible measure of this matter is that the authority should spend money on expanding road capacity and implementing road improvement scheme. As a result, there would be more space for a larger volume of traffic and safer roads for all inhabitants.
On the other hand, it is true that public transport systems also play a vital role in society. One reason is that travelling by public transports would help to ease pressure on the city’s main roads. The fewer people use private vehicles, the less traffic on the roads. For example, the metro systems in Hanoi are currently under construction and projected to be in operation by 2020, which are expected to help reduce traffic density and allow people to commute more easily and more quickly. Furthermore, better public transport systems would create a major lifestyle shift, encouraging people to leave their private vehicles at home. This could dramatically reduce pollution and improve air quality particularly in developing economies.
In conclusion, I believe that similar amount of money should be allocated to road and public transport to ensure smooth traffic flow.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-17 | khanhhuynh | 87 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: as
...improving roads and motorways. Firstly, as as there is a significant increase in the ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28327645051 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87616735276 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563139931741 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3509052631 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.2 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169922038242 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578332330597 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440626675699 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104559281094 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347862765852 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.