More and more people in the city live in homes with small spaces or no outdoor areas. Do you think it is a negative or positive development?
It is true that an increasing number of people have to live in houses or flats which are cramped or there is no outdoor area. While this trend could be positive to some extent, I would argue that its negative side is greater.
On the one hand, a small space offers people a frugal and simple lifestyle. First, since smaller houses or flats are cheaper to rent or buy, many urban dwellers opt to live in them as the best available option. These kinds of accommodation especially suit many young people who are studying or just have a job as they are living on a budget. Second, homeowners of small houses could be able to spend less time on cleaning up their home. This becomes increasingly important in the fast pace of life in which many people so catch up in the pressure of work, and need more leisure time to recharge their batteries.
On the other hand, I believe that this housing trend has a significant negative impact. One consideration is that the limitation of open spaces for physical activities discourages citizens to do workouts. This sedentary lifestyle makes people more prone to the risk of developing some forms of diseases such as obesity and diabetes. In addition, lack of spaces leads to lack of privacy which might result in interest conflicts between family members. For instance, children might find it really difficult to find a quiet private place to concentrate on their homework while their parents are watching television.
In conclusion, while small living spaces bring about several benefits, I believe that the drawbacks of this tendency are much greater.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-29 | Huỳnh Trí | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-04 | Nguyen Thuy Anh | 89 | view |
| 2022-06-05 | unknownabc | 79 | view |
| 2021-01-15 | Baonguyenqn3011 | 92 | view |
| 2020-03-11 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 89 | view |
- More big shopping malls are being built and they replace small shops Is this a positive or negative development 84
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as south pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 81
- Some people think that criminals should be given longer terms in prison, so as to reduce the crime rate. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilites. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? How can its popularity be increased? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, really, second, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86029411765 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58688760033 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599264705882 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.898670256 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.692307692 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230419924899 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715432079673 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413102848421 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12650134866 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217473971351 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.