tpo 8 the Chevalier
The material discusses the concept of the accuracy of the Chevalier’s memoir. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective. The reading challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details specific points regarding the topic, namely the Chevalier was not rich as he borrowed sums of money from a merchant. Next, he could not remember the conversation with Voltaire, because it was many years ago. Finally, the story of escaping him from the notorious prison is not logic.
Conversely, the listening challenges the points, one specific contradiction is borrowing money did not mean he was poor, the Chevalier might have properties have to sell first, but it convert these assets into actual money. So, he borrowed money from a merchant and was waiting for his money to arrive. In addition to that, he could remember the conversation between him and the Voltaire, because he wrote this conversations night by night. Moreover, witnesses who lived with him in his later life confirmed that he regularly consulted notes and journals when composing the memoir. One final point, the old Venetian government stated that the ceiling of the prison had to be repaired. Therefore, why they needed to repair it unless the Chevalier had escaped as he said.
In summary, there are discrepancies in the information presented.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ccuracy of the Chevalier's memoir. While the reading looks at the topic from one...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ints outlined in the reading passage. Firstly, the reading details specific po...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rom the notorious prison is not logic. Conversely, the listening challenges the...
^^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'converts'?
Suggestion: converts
...e properties have to sell first, but it convert these assets into actual money. So, he ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, in addition, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1149.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 220.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22272727273 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84394020116 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604545454545 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.444234056 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3846153846 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9230769231 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06452816374 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0898654761765 0.272083759551 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357833551739 0.0996497079465 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565589256891 0.0662205650399 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.051990912213 0.162205337803 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305714692948 0.0443174109184 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.