do you agree or disagree? people, who have few friends stable for a long time are happier than people who can make new friends easily?
Since the beginning of the current century, communication with people has become very important. Some people believe that deep relationships with small number of people is more significant than making new friends easily; however, there is a substantial body of evidence that casts doubts in this belief. From a personal perspective, making new friends and extent relationships is very crucial, given that it has positive impact on people’s personality, success and communications. Below I will strive my supporting points in more detail,
The first and foremost point, related good to many people affect humans’ personality. A vivid example can be given to shed light on what was elaborated above is people from poor countries usually immigrate looking for better life. Provided that they moved from their countries, they will leave their old friends. Making new friends in other countries is imperative to continue their life. Consequently, the ability to be flexible and engage easily with new friends has a great influential on people’s forward steps.
Next, coupled with flexibility, success is reason for the ability to make new friends easily. Having new friends has great benefits, given that it could provide people with new experience. A recent survey conducted by The University of Toronto found that people who could have lots of friends usually earn the key element of success. Not only they have good social networks, but also they could understand different people’s habits. Therefore, relating well to lots of friends is significant.
Although the previous reasons are the first ones cross the mind at a glance, they are not the only reasons available. There is another subtle point must be born in mind. The faster people could make new friends the better communication skills they could have. For instance, the prestigious IT companies such as Facebook, Microsoft and Apple usually want their employees to have the ability for teamwork. Provided that employees easily communicate and accept other, they can work in team which will boots companies’ productivity. As a result, having good social networks improves people skills.
Taking everything into consideration; without a doubt, people who can make new friends easily are happier. It is suggested that people compromise and ensure to achieve profound/superficial relationships balance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-07 | Christine hanna | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e my supporting points in more detail, The first and foremost point, related go...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntial on people's forward steps. Next, coupled with flexibility, success ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ell to lots of friends is significant. Although the previous reasons are the fi...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cial networks improves people skills. Taking everything into consideration; wi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2020.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48913043478 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0006645058 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554347826087 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7993267352 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1904761905 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5238095238 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04761904762 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323642429136 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104384626974 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870094080515 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205436758904 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586257403789 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.