working at a large company has more benefits than working at a small company.
There have been pros and cons regarding the argument that working at a large company has more benefits than working at a small company.
While both sides may have their own reasons to support their argument, I totally agree with this statement because large company employees can enjoy more benefits and build good work experience.
First of all, working in large company allows employees to get more benefits.
We cannot deny that the benefits of working for a large corporation are greater than those of working for a small one.
For example, large company has cafeteria, GYM, and nursery.
On the other hand, small businesses usually cannot afford to provides these benefits.
This show that workplace in large company is more charming than small company.
Also, working at a large company helps to build a good career for employees.
People can build good resumes by working for a small company, but generally the more big company has more reputation.
For example, suppose that you are interviewing two-applicants with the same amount of experience.
One comes from Microsoft and the other comes from a small, unknown company. You are more likely to choose the applicant from Microsoft because you will probably give more credit to his abilities that are proven by working for such a large company.
Overall, I agree that the statement about is true because working at a large company contribute to give a more good working condition and career development.
I strongly believe that the statement above is true above because the employees of large companies can get more benefits and build good work experience.
There is no doubt in my mind that working for a large company will benefit people professionally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-23 | cocoza@gmail.com | 90 | view |
| 2021-05-17 | GeniusM | 90 | view |
| 2020-03-09 | allen365 | 70 | view |
| 2019-09-17 | Chih-Chieh | 66 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | alex05622 | 60 | view |
- all students and professor take place face-to-face with other 60
- rtists create art with purpose. What do you think this artist’s purpose was in creating this work? Why do you think this? What clues can be found in the artwork and the title that lead you to this conclusion? Are there other themes that are addressed w 56
- A short, type written, couple of paragraphs, about the artist you want to write your analysis paper on. Why do you think this artist/artwork is important? 60
- The news media is a reliable source of unbiased information 60
- playing sports teaches us valuable life lessons. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 62, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'provide'.
Suggestion: provide
...all businesses usually cannot afford to provides these benefits. This show that workpla...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, regarding, so, while, for example, no doubt, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 284.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09507042254 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58312268639 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 212.727598566 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450704225352 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 458.1 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5387854588 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4666666667 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 14.0 4.53405017921 309% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.615178388192 0.236089414692 261% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.245355213604 0.076458572812 321% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172163178971 0.0737576698707 233% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257413728163 0.150856017488 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171905133225 0.0645574589148 266% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.