Teachers should get paid according to the performance of the student.
It is a tricky question that to decide a baseline to pay the teachers since the teacher does not only represent staff who working for private school or elementary school which focus on training students with basic knowledge nowadays. Teachers who work for training institutions and elementary schools may deserve the performance-pay system. However, those who work at high school and university should pay by multiple systems.
Admittedly, teachers’ primary work is teaching student knowledge so that in the early stage of teaching, students’ performance can indicate the teaching ability of a teacher. Although teaching language, music, art is very different from teaching math, physics, and chemistry, different pieces of knowledge have their characters which need schools to develop multiple students’ performances. For schools which are in beginning training level, no matter which subject, the major point is letting teachers introduce the basic knowledge to students. In this circumstance, paying teachers by students’ behavior in class and their test is reasonable and, furthermore, can drive teachers to devote more energy to preparing class interesting and understandable.
However, any school provides education above elementary teaching level conduct performance-pay systems can hurt both teachers and students. Take a liberal arts field subject, for example, student’s achievements not only based on cultivation in school but also largely depend on individual persistent efforts. Moreover, according to the education institution’s test way, it is very hard to say the school can test and measure every student performance precisely. A student who becomes a famous writer may do not succeed in school performance. Even though the teacher inspired them a decade ago, because of student’s performance in school the teacher cannot continue their career would be a shame to the education system. On the other hand, in math education which requires strict class practice allow teachers to use tons of homework to push students learning more. In this case, even students have a good performance on the test, they may hate math in their rest of life. However, the teacher will get a high salary.
Therefore, based on the shortage of student’s performance measures when deciding the teacher’s salary. It is unfair and unreasonable to use this method on any education institution above the elementary level.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-21 | Mukulmehta | 16 | view |
- All college and university students would benefit from spending at least one semester studying in a foreign country 66
- In order for any work of art — for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song — to have merit, it must be understandable to most people. 66
- "Erosion of beach sand along the shores of Tria Island is a serious threat to our island and our tourist industry. In order to stop the erosion, we should charge people for using the beaches. Although this solution may annoy a few tourists in the short te 82
- Claim Though often considered an objective pursuit learning about the historical past requires creativity Reason Because we can never know the past directly we must reconstruct it by imaginatively interpreting historical accounts documents and artifacts 77
- "During the past year, Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant, where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours. Experts say that significant contributing factors in many on-the-jo 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2094.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 370.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65945945946 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19735098536 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 640.8 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8079364937 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.176470588 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7647058824 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302091002299 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108663670566 0.0831039109588 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605230932295 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184360686659 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579655267782 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.