tpo 22 ethanol as a gasoline alternative
The material discusses the concept of using of ethanol as alternative to gasoline. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details specific points regarding this topic, namely ethanol is not a good replacement as it cannot solve the global warming problem. Next, using ethanol will consume animal food sources. Finally, ethanol does not have financial benefits.
Conversely, the listening challenges the points one specific contradiction is ethanol is a good alternative because it does not add to global warming. Given that ethanol made of plant, such as corn, growing plants absorb carbon dioxide that ethanol produce. Therefore, the growing plants remove carbon dioxide from atmosphere. In addition to that, ethanol does not reduce food sources of some animals. As ethanol produce from specific parts of plants which is the cellulose, these parts of the plants are not eaten by animals. One final point, ethanol can compete with the gasoline on prices. Increase the usage of ethanol will reduce its price. Moreover, there is a statistic done recently found that increase the usage of ethanol will produce ethanol three time greater, so ethanol price will drop by 40%.
In summary, there are obvious discrepancies in the presented information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oints outlined in the reading passage. Firstly, the reading details specific po...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...anol does not have financial benefits. Conversely, the listening challenges the...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er, so ethanol price will drop by 40%. In summary, there are obvious discrepanc...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, in addition, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 7.30242825607 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1152.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40845070423 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61244720999 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558685446009 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1598633547 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2857142857 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2142857143 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380775642821 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14767027134 0.0996497079465 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815039344383 0.0662205650399 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180253827967 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134747494143 0.0443174109184 304% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.