Nowadays in many countries women have full time jobs. Therefore, it is logical to share household tasks evenly between men and women. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
With the tremendous influence of modernisation, both men and women, nowadays, have become professionally independent. A matter of considerable controversy at present is whether both the genders should share house-related work or women are supposed to manage everything like earlier times. I partly agree with the assertion that household duties should be segregated equally with some exceptions which are better managed by a specific sex.
Several tasks can be taken care of irrespective of gender. Cooking, for instance, managed in parallel by both partners minimises the time involved to prepare multiple dishes. Similarly, cleaning of a house could be equally distributed either by splitting the number of floors or rooms between both family members. Lastly, the washing of clothes and utensils could be assigned to anyone and completed while cooking, to wrap-up things in a short time. This trend is usually seen among a plethora of families, especially in developed countries, where the household work is a responsibility of both householders and not only women.
Conversely, specific tasks such as gardening, grocery or construction of the house are not suitable for everyone. Vegetation and grass removal, for instance, requires physical strength which is mostly preferred to be done by men. Contrarily, women are better in buying merchandise for children, selecting grocery items and maintaining the limit of expenses versus monthly budget. Furthermore, refurbishment of an apartment in any sense like a painting of walls, fixing of bathroom objects or furniture is handled by male members of the family. Undoubtedly, these things can be controlled by any gender but it is likely to make one of them accountable to avoid imbalance and fasten the process.
In conclusion, I fervently consider the approach of sharing household work as highly beneficial in most of the cases, with an understanding that some tasks with physical inclination or with proper awareness are more effective if assigned to a particular gender.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-10 | Milan Desai | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | deeksha kapil | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | pardeepkumar0492 | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | vsharma28 | 84 | view |
- You feel the evening programs on a local television station are uninteresting.Write a letter to the manager of the television station. In your letter:Explain why you do not like the current programsDescribe what kind of programs you would like to see inst 78
- You feel the evening programs on a local television station are uninteresting.Write a letter to the manager of the television station. In your letter:Explain why you do not like the current programsDescribe what kind of programs you would like to see inst 78
- You had just missed a friend's party. Write a letter apologising and stating reasons- why you couldn't attend- how you will compensate- Ask how fun it was 73
- There have been some problems with public transportation in your area recently.Write a letter to the management of the public transport company. In your letterdescribe the problemsexplain how these problems are affecting the publicsuggest some changes tha 95
- Your local newspaper is offering an award for people who have helped the community. Write a letter to the newspaper editor. In your letter suggest someone you think should receive the award describe what the person does to help the community sugg 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, furthermore, if, lastly, similarly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46031746032 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09266641232 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615873015873 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7292808082 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.857142857 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176460508335 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557534904222 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476350898795 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107465341796 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451769002793 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.