Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
Political leaders' opinion has a significant effect on all people. This effect can go beyond country borders and influence other countries. Some people argue that in order to be effective, political leaders must agree with public opinion and leave principle for the advantage of an agreement; On the other hand, there are some others believe that the most crucial characteristic of a great leader is loyalty to particular principles and objectives. It should consider that a great leader must be robust and consistent in principles.
The first reason is loyalty to public expressed ideas. Virtually in all countries, people elect political leaders, so they expect them to be loyal to their promises. In many cases, people select ideas, not persons, so If an elected leader changes his/her opinions, people might not believe him/her. Despite this, the leaders of other countries cannot anticipate the behavior of a strange political leader. Policymakers concentrate on political leaders attitudes. Principles that changes many times can make mistakes for other countries policymakers.
The second reason is the continuous public controversy. Political leaders should settle public debates with an election in a democratic way. Although there are public elections, some people like to create a public controversy. A great political leader remains the principles but creates a situation for settling disputes. The act of changing ideas from time to time has severe effects. It causes public controversy forever, so the principles must be robust.
However, as I mentioned in the previous paragraph, Despite there are consistent principles, opponents should have permission to express their opinions. There are some opponents and proponents in every problem. Someone can find the best solution when all the evidence has gathered. Opponents and proponents express their opinions, and these ideas can help political leaders to find the best solution.
In sum, In my opinion, all political leaders must take precise objectives so that everyone can trace these objectives. Also, it should be a reasonable time and situation for opponents to express their ideas.
- Claim: the best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea. 50
- Claim: the best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea. 50
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 66
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
Political leaders opinion has a significant effect on all...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a democratic way" with adverb for "democratic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... settle public debates with an election in a democratic way. Although there are public elections, s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, in many cases, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 332.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51807228916 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83730463219 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509036144578 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.9215074465 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.2727272727 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0909090909 23.4991977007 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42458192974 0.243740707755 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118940939779 0.0831039109588 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102064588825 0.0758088955206 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241513372056 0.150359130593 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148552125735 0.0667264976115 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.14 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.