"Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.
Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The notion that we can learn more from those individuals whose views we share rather than from those whose views contradict our own due to the stress of the disagreement inhibiting learning, is be easily challenged. arguments with those who hold disparate perspectives will forces us to find a way to completely explain the point, and as a consequence the person will understand if the belief is fundamentally correct.
Despite not having a positive feeling when someone challenges your personal views, however this forces the individual to dissect their own thoughts. In turn, this allows the individual to learn a couple of things about himself such as the reasoning behind the belief held, and how to properly argue a point against someone else. During my college years, my roommate was an atheist, and we had several challenging conversations. I would argue why I believed in god, and he would argue against the idea of god's existence. Ultimately, I decided to put myself in his position and understood the validity of his argument. So, I learned how to defend my argument, and also that my beliefs are not absolute.
Secondly, learning from people with opposing views will enable individuals to grow and develop. Exercising critical thinking and having an open mind is a great skill to have. At my job, I had a supervisor who firmly believed everything he did was right. From his managing style, to the way he talked to his subordinates, he couldn't do anything wrong. As my previous college experience had taught me, I was able to argue with him and pinpoint the fallacies in his logic. I considered this to be therapy for him because over time, he understood that even with the best of intentions, no one is perfect. Not only that, he was able to sympathize with those individuals whom he firmly disagreed with.
On the other side of this argument, someone could point that individuals who suffer from anxiety may not learn because of the stress of learning from diverging ideas. this is not palatable because more harm is done to those individuals by letting them stay inside a bubble. it will not assuage the anxiety issue. In this specific case, one could try to take small steps to deal with the situation, but preventing them from stepping outside of the comfort zone is simply unacceptable.
In conclusion, we learn more from those whose beliefs don't align with ours as opposed to those who do. As it forces the individual to challenge their beliefs and to fully understand why they hold that idea. As a result, it leads to personal growth, open mindedness and a deeper understanding of alternating perspectives and fallacies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-08 | iRohan | 58 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | sushil koirala | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | priit | 58 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Mohit Raghuvanshi | 58 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | vishucology | 50 | view |
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner."Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Ce 55
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 16
- According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies act 49
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most co 66
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...he disagreement inhibiting learning, is be easily challenged. arguments with those...
^^
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Arguments
...ting learning, is be easily challenged. arguments with those who hold disparate perspecti...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'force'
Suggestion: force
...se who hold disparate perspectives will forces us to find a way to completely explain ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...e way he talked to his subordinates, he couldnt do anything wrong. As my previous colle...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 168, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...tress of learning from diverging ideas. this is not palatable because more harm is d...
^^^^
Line 7, column 275, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...s by letting them stay inside a bubble. it will not assuage the anxiety issue. In ...
^^
Line 9, column 55, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... we learn more from those whose beliefs dont align with ours as opposed to those who...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 33.0505617978 197% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2202.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 449.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90423162584 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78687954275 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527839643653 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 685.8 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1476659204 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.090909091 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4090909091 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206145314866 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577372634515 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11941059907 0.0758088955206 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140384448145 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127146009752 0.0667264976115 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.