Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
In the prompt, it is suggested that educators should learn what students want in their curriculum, and based on that information, they should offer those classes to them. I disagree with the posture because educators have a higher level of maturity and knowledge to set a path for those students to follow which will lead to their success. This doesn’t mean students concerns should go unnoticed, but the last word should come from those in charge.
Let’s assume the prompt talks about high school students. It is safe to say, that the majority of those in high school are not mature enough to comprehend the reasoning behind the curriculum presented to them. Most of them go through a hard phase and question things as they exist. This mentality will not allow them to find value in the education system they are in. Just like if an adult finds out a child wants an endless supply of candy, that doesn’t mean the adult will comply with the request. In the same manner, educators shouldn’t comply blindly with those requests from their students.
Moreover, if the prompt talks about college students, things don’t necessarily get better compared to high school students. Only a small amount of those entering higher education understand with certainty their desired plan for their college career. Many individuals do not know what exactly they intend to do in their future, and being exposed to a multitude of classes, people of different backgrounds, and challenging experiences will give them an idea of what they want to pursue. As a result, the current system set up by educators provides them with opportunities and any changes should be thoroughly reviewed.
In contrast, students may argue that they know more what they are given credit for. Some of them may do, and it would be unfair to generalize the qualities of the students. This is where the knowledge and experience of educators should come in handy by allowing students to have a say in curriculums. As long as those suggestions are presented in a properly though out manner, then those in charge should take into account the suggestion. I deeply wished in high school I would’ve had a class about life that would teach basic life tasks: how to open a bank account, or buy a home. Nonetheless, a basic level of communication should exist between students and educators.
In conclusion, educators should not blindly take any suggestions to alter the curriculum unless it’s presented along with a deep explanation behind the need for such change. Those in charge should listen to students, and ultimately make the final decision that will prove to offer new benefits to those learning when a new curriculum is implemented.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-11 | Mohit Raghuvanshi | 50 | view |
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 46
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that they have more leisure time.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting yo 66
- The following was presented as part of a business plan by Apex Corporation."To answer the increased demand for artisan coffee, Apex Corporation is releasing a new line of coffee, "Gourmet Select." Apex Corporation will first introduce the c 63
- Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, then, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2281.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 453.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0353200883 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74445055157 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507726269316 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 688.5 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4310344095 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.619047619 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09523809524 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20873745206 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661859604671 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463034004294 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13002221418 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422745085185 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.