The bar chart shows the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in diffrent schools in four countries USA, JAPAN, ICELAND, SPAIN, in year 2001.
The diagram reveals that the number os teaching hours by teacher in various schools are unequally distributed in four nations in 2001.
In primary schools, In USA and ICE LAND highest and lowest number of hours teacher spent teaching. Teaching hours in USA AND ICE LAND are approximately 750 and 550. Spanish and Japniese teachers spent approximately 650 and 550 hours teaching.
Lower secondary schools, There is huge diffrence between USA and other nations teaching hours. USA teachers averge 1000 hours spent teaching, which is apptoximately 250 hours more than Spanish teachers. Japniese and Ice land teachers spent equal hours, which are 650.
Upper secondary schools, All the nations give more importance to upper secondary education that clearly drescribed in graph. USA teachers remained at top in chart with 1150 teaching hours and it is followed by SPAIN and ICE LAND teachers WITH approimately 900 and 920 hours. With 700 teaching hours Japan stay at bottom in chart.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-28 | Sarwan1996 | 73 | view |
- The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sector's contribution to economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016. 73
- two pie charts compare the percentage wise share in Turkish economy by various sector's in 2000 and 2016 78
- Reasons to join college 61
- Car ownership 56
- All children should study a foreign language in school. Starting in the earliest grades. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 22
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Japan) must be used with a third-person verb: 'stays'.
Suggestion: stays
...20 hours. With 700 teaching hours Japan stay at bottom in chart.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23417721519 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57180178022 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537974683544 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4506157573 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331090460291 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146453980989 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074436739178 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217726853029 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371291430895 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.