The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the tourist information office in one city over a six month period in 2001.
The graph reveals the enquiries received per month by tourist information office in city over a half-year period in 2001.
We can see that enquiries over telephone were first choice in january, while in person enquiries at second with 750, however enquiries by letter/ emails counted 400. According to the chart, In the second month little difference was notice in enquiries. Telephone enquiries remained at top with 1000, while Letter and emails overtop the in person enquiries by 100 in quarter month. Letter or email enquiries gain top spot with about 1250 in april, but telephone enquiries slip too second spot, but the in person enquiries goes to nearly 600. Letter and emails remained at top with 1550 and 1900, however telephone enquiries behind letter or emails with 1400 and 1600, whereas popularity of in person enquiries decresced to near by 400 in may and june.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-08-30 | Sarwan1996 | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...while in person enquiries at second with 750, however enquiries by letter/ emails...
^^
Line 5, column 724, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
...ity of in person enquiries decresced to near by 400 in may and june.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 733.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 146.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02054794521 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47606760199 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4311595353 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561643835616 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9729250748 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.166666667 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226655738226 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154516867184 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180137985213 0.0843802449381 213% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.331587300624 0.15604864568 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.222165582045 0.0819641961636 271% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.