All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Consultancy can be described as the process of offering expertise knowledge in a particular field of practice. This knowledge could be gotten or achieved through experience ranging through a number of years. Companies today could operate much more efficiently if they employ such services.
Firstly, consultants have seen it and done it all. Consultants have vast experience working with a myriad of companies to help them scale up and operate much more efficiently. For whichever line of practice, they know which processes and methods produce better results. This could be gotten from years of research into those business areas and practices which have proved successful over the years or simply by experience which involves applying different methods to businesses and observing which help the business operate better and smoothly.
To a certain extent, companies listening to their employees could be advantageous. This is because, given the business area or practice, employees have first hand impact of good or bad business models. They could also have insights by interacting with clients and customers and such feedback could be relayed back to the appropriate channels. The flip side to this is that employees could make recommendations which could not solely be objective or beneficial to the business but in a bid to make tasks easier for themselves. A situation such as in IT solutions provision, an employee in his bid to not have to learn an entirely different technology to what he/she is used to, might relay to his superior that the clients are very happy with a particular technology, when in fact it would be more beneficial to the client to use a different technology.Whereas, the sole aim for a consultant, is to provide genuine insights which will be cost effective and make the business more efficient.
Ultimately, consultants are judged by antecedents, success stories etc. Coupled with experience of working with companies in similar business areas, this puts them in a better position to offer great advice to companies meaning to operate more efficiently.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | Bholuchand | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | Aishwarya01 | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | Isolus | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-23 | bacec | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Adesina Boluwatito | 83 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 79
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 45
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 64
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 853, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Whereas
...he client to use a different technology.Whereas, the sole aim for a consultant, is to p...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, whereas, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 334.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29640718563 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97986477968 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523952095808 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 103.731403546 60.3974514979 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.357142857 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23213938862 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958121775399 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784142817393 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16326697363 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321187585664 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.