It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole.
What are advantages and disadvantages of this development?
Nowadays, journeys to some of the remote areas of the natural environment has been made possible. Pros and cons have been identified following this advancement as people make their way to these areas for scientific research or for another tourist destination.
The good thing about traveling to the remote natural environment, like the South Pole, is the provision of a better opportunity for a great discovery. This is because there are still things that need to be unveiled in the planet and there are areas in that has not been discovered, yet. Apart from that, traveling to such areas gives a chance for individuals to see the beauty of nature that they are not able to see on a day to day basis. For instance, there are travelers who go to the highest region of the Earth just to witness the extravagant beauty of the Aurora Borealis. As a result, they are get to experience a fleeting feeling of happiness as they are able to achieve their objective in witnessing the vastness of nature.
The downside about this is that, there people who are unaware of their actions as they unknowingly contribute in the production of wastes in the areas where they travel. This lapse is always possible as they travel their way to their destinations and get to throw rubbish materials along the way. In addition, the extreme weather conditions such as typhoons or windstorms which are proven to endanger them while they take journey. This is totally out of control and inevitable as these occurrences happen anytime. For example, a major fleet in the middle of the ocean may encounter a road runner which is a wave the size of a tsunami. Hence, there are some of them who become unsuccessful or die along the course of the expedition.
As a whole, going to some of the remote places of the earth entails an amazing journey and great discoveries. However, the travel can provide a room for environmental problems or place someone in jeopardy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-08 | neethujithin | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | neethujithin | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Jonkun | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | Mr.Strange | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-29 | vinusharma27 | 89 | view |
- Do you support that the nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes?Use your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence. 73
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005.Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea, and make comparisons where appropriate. 67
- The charts A and B show the share of the UK and Australian cinema market in 2001 and cinema admission in the UK and Australia from 1976 to 2006. 73
- The first graph gives the number of passengers travelling by train in Sydney The second graph provides information on the percentage of trains running on time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wher 82
- The pie charts below show the coffee production coffee consumption and the profit distribution around the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
Nowadays, journeys to some of the remote areas of the natural environment...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 22, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... expedition. As a whole, going to some of the remote places of the earth entails an a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, so, still, while, apart from, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80952380952 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68787900086 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1367344726 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.733333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237883236937 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074030448287 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651425241858 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138169856412 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404623086529 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.