Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer
nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the
responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their
citizens themselves?
You should write at least 250 words.
Use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples
and with relevant evidence.
There is a debate that whether rich countries must provide many things for poorer ones or let their government take care them as it is their must-to-do things. To me, I do not strongly stand on what specific side. I think nurturing the citizens is the main mission of their government but wealthy countries should also give a hand with some stuffs supply only for those who have shortage of natural resources.
First of all, poor nations usually suffer famine, drought or many disasters all the time. They really need support from other countries. Even though each country have their own vision, mission and responsibility for their civilization, the scarcity of nature lead them to impoverishment. They want to independent but the conditions do not let them accomplish.
Secondly, the undeveloped countries do not have enough educated people to teach children since they all concentrate on survival first. Therefore, they can not update with the world, their vision will be narrow and they never catch others. That is why the wealthy nations should aid in widening their knowledge. In spite of giving them all of the things such as food, fruit, clean water, drugs…, training them to facing with the problems and how to search for solutions are better methods.
On the other hand, rich countries should not give a great deal of things in many fields to the poorer. These actions will make the government and people in undeveloped nations dependent and completely lean on the givers. If people get all things they want, they will not have any purpose for working. Their countries will gradually decrease and can not be risen up anymore. Hence, the givers should only supply enough the poor’s demand when their need is extremely essential.
To sum up, wealthy nations should be sympathy with the deficient ones by assisting them with daily stuffs and education but still can let them stand on their feet. Unless poor nations figure out the problems that they are facing with, they will never begin to improve and develop.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic:News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we be 11
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this taskThe chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods inBritain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information sho 84
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 89
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 412, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...who have shortage of natural resources. First of all, poor nations usually suffe...
^^^^
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...heir knowledge. In spite of giving them all of the things such as food, fruit, clean water...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 38, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
... To sum up, wealthy nations should be sympathy with the deficient ones by assisting th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, i think, such as, first of all, in spite of, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99411764706 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48415567382 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6772628625 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205368709836 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692513953879 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596824951672 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127815194245 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038048738523 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.