Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph make a picture of habits among UK people on consuming fruit and vegetable in the amount that are generally suggested. The analysis take in to account the following time point: 2002, 2006, 2010.
Form a first view we can say that in the 2006 there was the most consumption in fruit and vegetables and woman are whom who overcome the other two groups composed by men and children with a pick of 32% in 2006. Soon after woman there are men who remains in a range of 22-26% of that we also called “healthy food” consumption. It is than clear from the histograms that children are not used to be a great eaters of this category of food and they register a minimum level of 11% in 2002 and a most of 18% in 2006.
WE can conclude that the habits of consuming more organic foods is mainly of woman gender.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-26 | yeu192 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | yeu192 | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | Gaddam Ramya | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 61 | view |
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.Summar 73
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon, from egg to adult fish.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'makes'.
Suggestion: makes
The graph make a picture of habits among UK people on ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vercome the other two groups composed by men and children with a pick of 32% in 2...
^^
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'eater'?
Suggestion: eater
...hat children are not used to be a great eaters of this category of food and they regis...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 11% in 2002 and a most of 18% in 2006. WE can conclude that the habits of consu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 679.0 965.302439024 70% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43790849673 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43117927407 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62091503268 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 200.7 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.451579495 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.166666667 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216352043449 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105257804172 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765048443079 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152569776089 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096962715134 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.