The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Five Major Types of Fast Food Eaten in Melbourne (units)
2005 Present 2025
Hamburgers 40 38 51
Fried Chicken 35 37 45
Salads 5 15 41
Fried Rice 6 9 9
Noodles 6 8 9
You should write at least 150 words.
The table projects the consumption of five major types of fast food eaten in Melbourne. The data is calculated over the time period of 2005 to 2025.
Hamburgers dominated in high numbers during 2005 closely followed by fried chicken. Although, they have taken a slight dip in present time. They are expected to rise in numbers by 2025. Fried chicken keeps up with the hamburgers in close competition. They are expected to maintain the steady growth in numbers.
Salads had a slow start in terms of consumption. But it presents with an accelerated growth over time. Salads expected to be in par with hamburgers and fried chicken by 2025 as they are calculated to double their numbers in foreseen future.
At last, both fried rice and noodles had the identical head start in 2005, with the former slightly edging over the latter in present time period. In conclusion, both food items are predicted to be in the same level by 2025.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-10 | phoaiphuthinh | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | arjnaga | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | ravitejacts | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-03 | Võ Ngọc Trang Thanh | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-19 | vijayvj1 | 56 | view |
- Structure your answers in logical paragraphs 11
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Five Major Types of Fast Food Eaten in Melbourne (units)2005P 56
- Some people believe that universities should make sport a compulsory module on all degree courses as rates of obesity are getting higher and higher. To what extent do you agree? 61
- Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates results in low art education. 73
- The charts below give information about attendance at entertainment venuesand admission prices to those venues in 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, andmake comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...2005 closely followed by fried chicken. Although, they have taken a slight dip in presen...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 783.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86335403727 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52449135373 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8795476059 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.25 112.824112599 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.4166666667 22.9334400587 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0798753891865 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395227958293 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113329690346 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.07831035409 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117121614803 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.2329268293 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 11.4329268293 39% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.