Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
No one can deny the importance of teacher's role in our lives. If I were forced to choose, I would definitely assert that this statement is completely true. Even though some people believe that teachers should talk about their social or political views in the classroom, it is my firm belief that it is better for teachers to not state their opinion in the classroom. I have two major reasons to support my claim, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, I think when teachers talk about their opinion, they are going to affect the students. In this case, the students could not be in control of their belief system. It is possible that their opinions are going to change only because of another person's idea. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. For example, when I was student, one of my teacher was an old man named MR. Johnson. He taught us history. He was a strict teacher and no one could argue with him. One time when he was teaching us about the World War two, he said something that was wrong. I got confused but I thought maybe what I learned before was not right. I completely change my idea over that point. After couple of years, I found out that mentioned point was wrong. It was so hard to me because I learnt that point in a wrong way only because of that teacher's opinion. I think this example could vividly show you how much is critical to not force our idea on some one else.
Secondly, it is possible that when students know about teachers their behavior is going to change. It is undeniable that some people could not tolerate the opposition's opinion. Therefore, their behavior could change dramatically. For example, one of my friends lived in other country. He was a teacher there. He used to teach them biology. One time, he wanted to break the ice in the classroom. He said something which could consider as insult. His students took that saying very seriously. They changed their behavior. They were rude to my friend. As a result, my friend did not continue to work there. He had to quit his job. I think examples like this could represent the importance of not sharing your opinion to your student when you work as a teacher.
In the light of above mentioned reasons, I think teachers should not state their opinion in front of their students. I provide some reasons to support my assertion. I think two major reasons are the fact the students could get affected and that could alter their belief system and the other one is possibility that students could change the way that students treat with those teachers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | naziii | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | shrijan | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend."Of the two leading real estate firms in our town — Adams Realty and Fitch Realty — Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many 50
- Unfortunately, in contemporary society, creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your r 50
- TPO-3 Integrated writing 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...going to change only because of another persons idea. I have to admit that my opinion o...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 869, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... hard to me because I learnt that point in a wrong way only because of that teachers opinion. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 905, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...int in a wrong way only because of that teachers opinion. I think this example could viv...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1013, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...ch is critical to not force our idea on some one else. Secondly, it is possible tha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 157, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'oppositions'' or 'opposition's'?
Suggestion: oppositions'; opposition's
...that some people could not tolerate the oppositions opinion. Therefore, their behavior coul...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i think, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 93.0 43.0788530466 216% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2191.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 475.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61263157895 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40723747141 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475789473684 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 662.4 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 31.0 9.59856630824 323% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.6003584229 165% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.3938550481 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.4411764706 100.406767564 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9705882353 20.6045352989 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.79411764706 5.45110844103 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.88709677419 307% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205364149652 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502448870774 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536424531093 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15387258319 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479398764777 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.3 11.7677419355 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 58.1214874552 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.1575268817 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.