Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In contemporary times, some people believe that the government ought to give financial support to imaginative artists such as painters and musicians. However, others argue that imaginative artists ought to be funded by different sources. In my view, I think that creative artists could get finance from other sources.
On the one hand, arts are considered a national interest. Thus, governments should give money to aid creative artists such as painters, this can maintain organizations that preserve arts. For example, in some countries such as the UK, the USA or Australia have art museums all over the country include ancient arts or inventive arts which help increase the number of people who interest with this fields. Furthermore, arts are considered to be a great form of entertainment by several people in the country. For instance, music is considered very lucrative for themselves and their nation. So, governments should support to creative artists such as painters and musicians to improves the livelihood of thousands of people who base their career on creative artists.
On the other hand, I believe that creative artists can bring some benefits for themselves rather than waiting for money support from the government. First of all, creative artists have lots of advantages. Some artists sell their works to find a great deal of money. For example, almost artists sell their arts and music in many ways such as updating YouTube, selling their CDs or selling their copyright which helps them earn the extra royalties. Finally, I also think that the government gives financial support to creative artists, namely painters and musicians which is a waste of money because they can get money from different sources in domestic or overseas nations. Another good example of this is that, some artists in the UK or the USA who often paint some pictures or sing their songs on the street which help them show their talent and find money from admirers.
In conclusion, some people think that governments should give financial to creative artists such as painters and musicians. However, I believe that creative artists can find money or receive funding from other sources.
- Some people believe that the only purpose of films are entertain. But others say films should have educational value. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous governments’ expenditures. This money should be used in new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The government should control the amount of violence in films and television in order to decrease the violent crimes in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this issue? 56
- transport preferences among young people from different countries 67
- The table below gives information about languages with the most native speakers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words.https://www.ielts-exam.net/images/graphs/I 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 393, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... the number of people who interest with this fields. Furthermore, arts are considere...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19491525424 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6100915316 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463276836158 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7609463548 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.176470588 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8235294118 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.47058823529 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448383242985 0.244688304435 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179383316861 0.084324248473 213% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15434803034 0.0667982634062 231% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.380498182449 0.151304729494 251% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161350862312 0.056905535591 284% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.